• Unfortunately, #ThomasJefferson, 3rd#POTUS was a critic of Paul, the #Apostle of the #Gentiles, who wrote 14 of the 27 #NewTestament #Scriptures accepted by many #Church Leaders for Centuries!!

    In a letter to William Short in 1820, Jefferson described many biblical passages as "so much untruth, charlatanism and imposture". In the same letter Jefferson states he describes Paul as the "first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus".[60]

    “Paul was the great Coryphaeus, and first corrupter of the doctrines of #Jesus. these palpable interpolations and falsifications of his doctrines led me to try to sift them apart.” #Monticello Apr. 13, 1820

    Reminder, Paul said: #1Corinthians 11:1 #kjv #kingjamesbible Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of #Christ.

    This link, the Resurrected Lord #JesusChrist told Ananias:

    https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Acts-9-15/

    Other links of evidence:

    https://www.judaismvschristianity.com/chapter-15-the-law-stands-and-more-of-pauls-doctrinal-errors/
    Unfortunately, #ThomasJefferson, 3rd#POTUS was a critic of Paul, the #Apostle of the #Gentiles, who wrote 14 of the 27 #NewTestament #Scriptures accepted by many #Church Leaders for Centuries!! In a letter to William Short in 1820, Jefferson described many biblical passages as "so much untruth, charlatanism and imposture". In the same letter Jefferson states he describes Paul as the "first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus".[60] “Paul was the great Coryphaeus, and first corrupter of the doctrines of #Jesus. these palpable interpolations and falsifications of his doctrines led me to try to sift them apart.” #Monticello Apr. 13, 1820 Reminder, Paul said: #1Corinthians 11:1 #kjv #kingjamesbible Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of #Christ. This link, the Resurrected Lord #JesusChrist told Ananias: https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Acts-9-15/ Other links of evidence: https://www.judaismvschristianity.com/chapter-15-the-law-stands-and-more-of-pauls-doctrinal-errors/
    WWW.KINGJAMESBIBLEONLINE.ORG
    ACTS 9:15 KJV "But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the..."
    Acts 9:15 KJV: But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel:
    Like
    1
    ·1797 Views ·1 Shares
  • While it is probable that NT manuscripts may have appeared in the Syriac language before they appeared in Greek since Christianity was first preached in Syria before it spread to Greece, the following reports that the oldest surviving Syriac translation of any portion of the NT dates only back to the sixth century whereas the oldest portions of the NT in Greek date back before the fourth century but still, there remains very little difference between the Syriac and Greek translations as far doctrinal teachings and recorded accounts are concerned.
    https://www.christianpost.com/news/scientist-discovers-erased-1750-year-old-bible-translation.html?utm_medium=notification&utm_content=headline&utm_source=onesignal&utm_campaign=2023-04-12
    While it is probable that NT manuscripts may have appeared in the Syriac language before they appeared in Greek since Christianity was first preached in Syria before it spread to Greece, the following reports that the oldest surviving Syriac translation of any portion of the NT dates only back to the sixth century whereas the oldest portions of the NT in Greek date back before the fourth century but still, there remains very little difference between the Syriac and Greek translations as far doctrinal teachings and recorded accounts are concerned. https://www.christianpost.com/news/scientist-discovers-erased-1750-year-old-bible-translation.html?utm_medium=notification&utm_content=headline&utm_source=onesignal&utm_campaign=2023-04-12
    WWW.CHRISTIANPOST.COM
    Scientist discovers 'erased' 1,750-year-old New Testament translation using ultraviolet photography
    A scientist claims to have discovered a hidden ancient translation containing portions of the Gospel of Matthew which are said to be the only known remnant of the fourth manuscript that attests to ...
    ·450 Views
  • The problem here is not whether or not a married couple is interracial, inter-ethnic, or, originating from two different nations but whether or not both spouses are of the same religious faith. In this case, if a Jew and Gentile both abide in the same religious faith, there should be no reason for conflict on either a spiritual, doctrinal, or theological level.

    The problem arises when one spouse adheres to a religious faith different from that of the other as there can nothing more divisive than clashing spiritualities as one’s faith and the doctrines thereof affect sets the basis for moral and ethical choices, priorities, and even how children are brought up and when two people adhering to different faiths marry, there is bound to be doctrinal, philosophical, moral, ethical, and interest clashes which subjects the marriage to instability and likely even failure which is why scripture states, “Be not unequally yoked with the unbelieving.” (2 Cor. 6:14)

    Yet far too often amongst professing Christians, scripture is disregarded as some naively and foolishly justify choosing an unbeliever to marry by thinking that by joining to them in marriage they might be able to persuade them to come to Christ but this almost never happens and the professing Christian is forced to choose between their devotion to Christ or the unbelieving spouse and tragically, they abandon their service to Christ to appease the unbelieving spouse because they never trusted God enough to provide them a suitable spouse for them to begin with; their reasoning for marrying the unbelieving spouse often being founded on superficialities and not on that which actually holds a marriage together: Love for one another, trustworthiness, spiritual, moral, and doctrinal compatibility, and like-minded priorities.

    In the case of those professors of the faith who have unbelieving spouse, the Apostle Paul advises the saints that in such cases that if the unbelieving spouse wishes to remain married to them in spite of an unwavering devotion to Christ on the part of the believer, that they should remain together, but if the unbelieving spouse wishes to depart from the believing spouse, then let them depart as the believing spouse is not bound to the unbeliever in the same sense that they would be if both spouses followed Christ (1 Cor. 7:12-15) and therefore is free to marry again but this time, it must only be to a devoted follower of Christ.
    https://jewsforjesus.org/publications/inherit/finding-spiritual-harmony-in-your-interfaith-relationship
    The problem here is not whether or not a married couple is interracial, inter-ethnic, or, originating from two different nations but whether or not both spouses are of the same religious faith. In this case, if a Jew and Gentile both abide in the same religious faith, there should be no reason for conflict on either a spiritual, doctrinal, or theological level. The problem arises when one spouse adheres to a religious faith different from that of the other as there can nothing more divisive than clashing spiritualities as one’s faith and the doctrines thereof affect sets the basis for moral and ethical choices, priorities, and even how children are brought up and when two people adhering to different faiths marry, there is bound to be doctrinal, philosophical, moral, ethical, and interest clashes which subjects the marriage to instability and likely even failure which is why scripture states, “Be not unequally yoked with the unbelieving.” (2 Cor. 6:14) Yet far too often amongst professing Christians, scripture is disregarded as some naively and foolishly justify choosing an unbeliever to marry by thinking that by joining to them in marriage they might be able to persuade them to come to Christ but this almost never happens and the professing Christian is forced to choose between their devotion to Christ or the unbelieving spouse and tragically, they abandon their service to Christ to appease the unbelieving spouse because they never trusted God enough to provide them a suitable spouse for them to begin with; their reasoning for marrying the unbelieving spouse often being founded on superficialities and not on that which actually holds a marriage together: Love for one another, trustworthiness, spiritual, moral, and doctrinal compatibility, and like-minded priorities. In the case of those professors of the faith who have unbelieving spouse, the Apostle Paul advises the saints that in such cases that if the unbelieving spouse wishes to remain married to them in spite of an unwavering devotion to Christ on the part of the believer, that they should remain together, but if the unbelieving spouse wishes to depart from the believing spouse, then let them depart as the believing spouse is not bound to the unbeliever in the same sense that they would be if both spouses followed Christ (1 Cor. 7:12-15) and therefore is free to marry again but this time, it must only be to a devoted follower of Christ. https://jewsforjesus.org/publications/inherit/finding-spiritual-harmony-in-your-interfaith-relationship
    JEWSFORJESUS.ORG
    Finding Spiritual Harmony in Your Interfaith Relationship
    Cross-cultural challenges can result in marital complications. There is hope for struggling Jewish Gentile couples. Read now ›
    ·445 Views
  • I like and go by the #Jewish Calendar
    From my #Doctrinal Statement!
    #Creation
    I reject the theory of #Evolution as an unscientific system of religious belief. (#Romans 1:20-25) I believe that #God created all things by #JesusChrist (Ephesians 3:9) I believe in the literal creation account (6 Days!) of #Genesis 1. I also reject the "Gap theory" as well as the "Day-age theory". The Bible teaching of creation lines up perfectly with the known laws of science, (things were good in the beginning, and get worse with age) whereas the theory of evolution goes against this established FACT of science by teaching that everything gets BETTER with time. This is not true of the natural world, and it is not true of the spiritual world either!

    I reject the teaching that there was a flood prior to the 6 day creation to destroy an #angelic kingdom from a fall of #Lucifer. (Gap of time between Genesis 1:1 & 2)

    I believe the first day of earth (Day 1 of Creation) was #October 1, 3761 B.C. and October 7, 3761 B.C. (Year AM 1 on the Jewish Calendar - Year of the #Mundane Era) The date God created #Adam and #Eve (1 Timothy 4:1-3, 2 Timothy 3:1-7, & 4:3-4)
    I like and go by the #Jewish Calendar From my #Doctrinal Statement! #Creation I reject the theory of #Evolution as an unscientific system of religious belief. (#Romans 1:20-25) I believe that #God created all things by #JesusChrist (Ephesians 3:9) I believe in the literal creation account (6 Days!) of #Genesis 1. I also reject the "Gap theory" as well as the "Day-age theory". The Bible teaching of creation lines up perfectly with the known laws of science, (things were good in the beginning, and get worse with age) whereas the theory of evolution goes against this established FACT of science by teaching that everything gets BETTER with time. This is not true of the natural world, and it is not true of the spiritual world either! I reject the teaching that there was a flood prior to the 6 day creation to destroy an #angelic kingdom from a fall of #Lucifer. (Gap of time between Genesis 1:1 & 2) I believe the first day of earth (Day 1 of Creation) was #October 1, 3761 B.C. and October 7, 3761 B.C. (Year AM 1 on the Jewish Calendar - Year of the #Mundane Era) The date God created #Adam and #Eve (1 Timothy 4:1-3, 2 Timothy 3:1-7, & 4:3-4)
    ·279 Views
  • Why did John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Barrett betray President Trump, the American People and the Constitution in refusing to hear
    the 2020 election fraud cases? They, as leaders of the American judiciary, promised they would not allow Vatican influence and their doctrinal beliefs to interfere in doing their jobs. JFK was a Catholic, and he kept his word in this. So, why did they betray us? https://www.nytimes.com/1984/01/11/world/us-and-vatican-restore-full-ties-after-117-years.html
    Why did John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Barrett betray President Trump, the American People and the Constitution in refusing to hear the 2020 election fraud cases? They, as leaders of the American judiciary, promised they would not allow Vatican influence and their doctrinal beliefs to interfere in doing their jobs. JFK was a Catholic, and he kept his word in this. So, why did they betray us? https://www.nytimes.com/1984/01/11/world/us-and-vatican-restore-full-ties-after-117-years.html
    ·85 Views